under the color of authority - continues

---

 For one individual, a cycle of harassment and defamation has spanned over three decades. Despite holding a graduate degree, he became homeless a year ago, driven to the margins by relentless persecution. His only hope lies in hiring private investigators from outside the region to gather evidence and end the abuse. Yet, without the financial means to do so, pursuing a defamation case remains out of reach.

The obstacles he faces are as elusive as they are calculated. There are no clear names to accuse, no one to hold accountable. Those who may have been enlisted to spread falsehoods remain silent, likely under instructions not to disclose any information—an effort, perhaps, to avoid accusations of obstructing justice. And so, the cycle continues.

Recently, his circumstances have worsened. There have been attempts to have him fired from his current job, and just days ago, Uber deactivated his account, claiming his driver’s license was fraudulent—the same license he has used for over a decade. This comes on the heels of another four-month deactivation last year, after fraudulent accounts were opened under his name - it happened at the worse time, rendering him homeless.

Speculation points to law enforcement as the source of these actions, allegedly to uncover hidden or undeclared income. A letter from a Los Angeles City office once accused him of receiving a large sum of money while conducting business without a license—a claim that seemed to justify the intensified scrutiny. Yet no evidence has surfaced, leaving these accusations hanging in a cloud of uncertainty.

Now, he stands once more on the edge of a precipice, his present a treacherous path and his future uncertain. Those operating under the guise of authority seem to act without accountability, wielding power with impunity. Without the financial means to fight back, his options are limited.

Latest Accounts:

Currently, he works as a substitute teacher. In February 2025, another substitute teacher, affiliated with a different agency, referred him to their organization. This referral came with a financial incentive—$2,000 for the person who made the recommendation—part of the agency’s effort to recruit more substitutes to meet demand.

The agency quickly confirmed the referral and showed great eagerness to receive his application. For several days, they persistently urged him to submit his resume and apply for the substitute teaching role. However, this position was not a guaranteed placement but rather an on-call role, where substitutes are available to cover for absent teachers on a day-to-day basis.

Before submitting his application via email, he was assured that the onboarding process would take only one or two days. However, as time passed, no response came. When he followed up with the person who had insisted he apply, he was told that his application was likely still in the queue and that someone would contact him if he was a suitable fit. Despite these assurances, nearly a month has passed, and it seems increasingly unlikely that he will hear from them. Notably, he already works for a different substitute teaching agency that, according to the person who referred him, operates in exactly the same manner.

This experience mirrors an incident from about a year and a half ago when he interviewed for a teaching position at a school where he had previously worked for a few weeks. At that time, he was well-liked and respected for his effective teaching methods. In fact, the school itself reached out to encourage him to apply for an open position in his field. Everything seemed to be going well until an unexpected shift occurred during the interview process.

The interview, conducted over Skype, had not even begun when the hiring official—who had initially been eager to bring him on board—suddenly became condescending. It quickly became apparent that something was off. The interviewer questioned his motivation for applying, insinuating that he was interested in the position due to the presence of female students in the classroom—an unfounded and deeply troubling implication.

Due to the covert nature of certain actions taken by authorities—often involving defamation and hidden maneuvers—fully understanding what is happening remains challenging. However, patterns like these have occurred far too frequently to be dismissed as mere coincidence. Coupled with instances of surveillance and harassment, the situation suggests that there is more at play than meets the eye.

Currently, he is working on compiling a detailed history of similar incidents spanning the last three decades. Stay tuned for more.

If you have insights or solutions that could counter these actions, consider sharing them—anonymously or otherwise—on this site. Perhaps together, we can shed light on the forces that remain in the shadows.